Goldfish

Best Goldfish Alternatives in 2025

3 alternatives found

Overview of Goldfish

Goldfish is a Mac-native AI assistant that remembers your recent work across all apps, allowing you to draft replies, summarize threads, rewrite sentences, or recall details without re-explaining context. It works by pressing Option in any text field, making it a seamless, private, and lightweight tool for personal productivity and writing.

Why Look for Alternatives

While Goldfish excels at providing instant, context-aware writing assistance on your Mac, it may not suit everyone. You might need:

  • Cross-platform or team-wide context: Goldfish is limited to your Mac; alternatives like Agently connect company tools.
  • Task management or automation: Goldfish focuses on writing, not organizing tasks or executing workflows.
  • Developer-specific features: If you work with AI coding agents, tools like Skillkit offer persistent memory for codebases.
  • Browser-only or web app focus: Goldfish works across all apps, but some users prefer a browser-centric tool.

Top Alternatives

1. 2-b.ai (Score: 35/100)

2-b.ai integrates AI with task management, turning web content into actionable tasks. It offers AI-powered planning and goal breakdown, with a lightweight browser extension that works across many web apps.

Pros:

  • Turns web content into tasks with AI assistance.
  • AI-powered planning and goal breakdown.
  • Lightweight browser extension reduces context switching.

Cons:

  • Lacks persistent, private memory across the entire Mac.
  • Limited to browser-based tasks; doesn't work in desktop apps.
  • Focuses on task management, not on-the-fly writing assistance.

Use cases: Choose 2-b.ai over Goldfish if your primary need is to capture and organize tasks from web content with AI assistance, rather than needing a context-aware writing assistant that works across all apps on your Mac.

2. Agently (Score: 35/100)

Agently connects to 100+ tools (Stripe, Slack, Linear, etc.) for a company-wide context, not just personal Mac activity. It can autonomously execute workflows end-to-end and is designed for team collaboration and operational automation.

Pros:

  • Connects to 100+ tools for company-wide context.
  • Autonomously executes workflows end-to-end.
  • Designed for team collaboration and automation.

Cons:

  • Heavy, team-oriented platform requiring integration setup.
  • Cloud-based company brain, not a private local assistant.
  • Steeper learning curve and likely higher cost than Goldfish (free during alpha).

Use cases: Choose Agently over Goldfish if you need a company-wide AI that connects all your business tools, automates workflows, and acts autonomously across teams, rather than a personal writing assistant that remembers your recent work on your Mac.

3. Skillkit (Score: 30/100)

Skillkit provides persistent memory for AI coding agents, helping maintain context across sessions. It auto-generates instructions from your codebase and supports a wide range of AI coding agents and tools.

Pros:

  • Persistent memory for AI coding agents.
  • Auto-generates instructions from your codebase.
  • Supports many AI coding agents and tools.

Cons:

  • Focused on AI coding agents and developer workflows, not general text composition.
  • Lacks instant, in-app drafting and rewriting for everyday messaging or email.
  • Requires CLI usage and is geared toward technical users.

Use cases: Choose Skillkit if you are a developer who needs to maintain context and share skills across multiple AI coding agents, rather than needing quick, context-aware writing assistance in any app.

How to Choose

To pick the right alternative, consider:

  • Your primary need: If you need instant writing help across all Mac apps, Goldfish is ideal. For task management from web content, try 2-b.ai. For team-wide automation, consider Agently. For developer coding agent context, Skillkit fits.
  • Platform and scope: Goldfish is Mac-only and personal. Alternatives may offer cross-platform, browser-only, or company-wide capabilities.
  • Complexity and cost: Goldfish is free and simple. Agently and Skillkit may require setup and have costs.
  • Privacy: Goldfish keeps memory private on your Mac. Agently is cloud-based; 2-b.ai and Skillkit vary.

Evaluate your workflow, team size, and technical comfort to find the best fit.

Alternatives

2-b.ai

What if your to-do list met ChatGPT directly in your browser? 2-b.ai combines the structure of a task manager (like Todoist) with the brain of an LLM (like ChatGPT). Highlight-to-Capture: Highlight text to turn it into tasks from any tab. AI Planning: Instantly break down goals into actionable steps. Chat to Execute: Ask the AI to help you finish your work.

Pros

  • + 2-b.ai integrates task management with AI, making it easier to turn web content into actionable tasks.
  • + It offers AI-powered planning and breakdown of goals, which can help users organize their work more systematically.
  • + The browser extension is lightweight and works across many web apps, reducing the need for switching contexts.

Cons

  • - 2-b.ai lacks the persistent, private memory across the entire Mac that Goldfish provides, so it cannot recall past work without manual input.
  • - It is limited to browser-based tasks and does not work in desktop apps or text fields outside the browser.
  • - 2-b.ai focuses on task management rather than on-the-fly writing assistance like drafting replies or summarizing threads.

Choose 2-b.ai over Goldfish if your primary need is to capture and organize tasks from web content with AI assistance, rather than needing a context-aware writing assistant that works across all apps on your Mac.

Agently

<p>Every other tool answers, retrieves, or runs brittle rules. Agently holds your whole company in context and does the work. 100+ connectors flow into one brain that never forgets. It links a Stripe event to a Slack thread to a Linear ticket on its own. When something needs doing, Jarvis routes it to an agent that runs it end to end: triggered, running, shipped. The work lands without you, nothing falls through the cracks. Connecting takes minutes. The layer between today's AI and tomorrow's AGI.</p>

Pros

  • + Agently connects to 100+ tools (Stripe, Slack, Linear, etc.) for a company-wide context, not just personal Mac activity.
  • + It can autonomously execute workflows end-to-end, not just assist with writing.
  • + Designed for team collaboration and operational automation, not individual productivity.

Cons

  • - Agently is a heavy, team-oriented platform requiring integration setup, whereas Goldfish is a lightweight personal assistant that works instantly on any Mac text field.
  • - Goldfish focuses on private, local memory for writing assistance; Agently is a cloud-based company brain for automating business processes.
  • - Goldfish is free during alpha and simpler to start using; Agently likely has a steeper learning curve and cost.

Choose Agently over Goldfish if you need a company-wide AI that connects all your business tools, automates workflows, and acts autonomously across teams, rather than a personal writing assistant that remembers your recent work on your Mac.

Skillkit

The universal skill platform for AI coding agents. Auto-generate instructions with Primer, persist learnings with Memory, and distribute across Mesh networks. One CLI for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and 28 more.

Pros

  • + Skillkit provides persistent memory for AI coding agents, which can help maintain context across sessions.
  • + It auto-generates instructions from your codebase, reducing the need to re-explain project context.
  • + Supports a wide range of AI coding agents and tools, offering flexibility for developers.

Cons

  • - Skillkit is focused on AI coding agents and developer workflows, not general text composition or communication tasks.
  • - It does not offer the same instant, in-app drafting and rewriting capabilities for everyday messaging or email.
  • - Requires CLI usage and is geared toward technical users, unlike Goldfish's simple keyboard shortcut approach.

Choose Skillkit if you are a developer who needs to maintain context and share skills across multiple AI coding agents, rather than needing quick, context-aware writing assistance in any app.