Best Cluing Hosted Agents Alternatives in 2025

5 alternatives found

Overview of Cluing Hosted Agents

Cluing Hosted Agents is a collaborative AI agent platform that moves agents from a single laptop into a shared workspace. It allows teams to start work on one device, continue on another, and hand off tasks to teammates without losing context. The platform emphasizes evolving skills that update as new insights are collected, turning agents into a team asset. Users can assign tasks, publish their work, and connect to any external tool via API or MCP using custom connectors. The core value proposition is closing the laptop while the work continues, enabling seamless collaboration and knowledge sharing.

Why Look for Alternatives

While Cluing Hosted Agents offers a unique blend of collaboration and knowledge management, there are several reasons you might consider alternatives:

Cost: Cluing is a paid service, whereas some alternatives are open-source or offer more generous free tiers.
Specialization: If your primary need is coding, a developer-centric agent client might be more efficient.
Autonomy: Some teams require fully autonomous, end-to-end task execution without manual oversight.
Integration: You might need a broader set of pre-built connectors or support for specific messaging channels.
Customization: Developers may want to embed agents directly into their own applications, requiring an SDK.

Top Alternatives

1. Agently (Score: 72/100)

Agently is a strong alternative for teams seeking high autonomy. It offers 100+ connectors, covering more tools out-of-the-box than Cluing's custom connectors. Its orchestrator (Jarvis) enables triggered, running, and shipped tasks with minimal human intervention. Agently positions itself as a 'company brain' that acts across the entire stack, making it ideal for cross-tool workflows. However, it may lack Cluing's depth in context building and collaboration, and it is geared toward larger startup teams with a more complex setup.

2. 1Code (Score: 65/100)

1Code is an open-source, free alternative that is developer-friendly. It offers a visual, Cursor-like UI with diff previews and a built-in git client. It supports multiple AI models (Claude Code, Codex) and BYOK, giving flexibility. Local execution options (worktrees) appeal to those who want to keep code on their own machine. It includes a kanban board and automations for team coordination. However, it is primarily a coding agent client, lacking Cluing's shared knowledge base and general-purpose agent hosting.

3. Epismo (Score: 65/100)

Epismo provides a structured project management layer with AI agents assigned to tasks. It emphasizes reusable workflows and community-built templates, making it easy to start with proven processes. It integrates multiple AI models (Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, NotebookLM) directly into task execution, offering explicit multi-agent orchestration. However, it may not match Cluing's context persistence and knowledge management, nor its ability to deploy outputs like websites or dashboards.

4. AgentSky (Score: 65/100)

AgentSky offers a broader range of agent harnesses (Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw) and model choices. It provides access through multiple channels including WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Slack, and a developer API, which is convenient for messaging-based interactions. Its managed sandbox with persistent workspace and recovery is robust for long-running tasks. However, it focuses more on individual agent execution and lacks Cluing's collaborative context and knowledge sharing features.

5. 21st Agents SDK (Score: 35/100)

21st Agents SDK is a developer-first SDK for embedding AI agents into your own applications. It offers built-in infrastructure like streaming, session management, usage billing, and observability, making it suitable for production-grade features. Backed by Y Combinator, it has strong startup support. However, it lacks Cluing's collaborative workspace features, requires development effort, and does not include knowledge capture tools. It is best for engineering teams building custom agent features.

How to Choose

When selecting an alternative to Cluing Hosted Agents, consider the following:

Team Collaboration: If shared context and handoff are critical, Cluing or Agently (with its company brain) may be best.
Developer Focus: For coding tasks, 1Code offers a visual, git-integrated experience.
Autonomy Level: If you need hands-off automation, Agently's orchestrator is a strong choice.
Integration Needs: Evaluate the number and type of connectors. Agently has 100+, while Cluing offers custom API/MCP connectors.
Deployment: If you need to deploy outputs (e.g., websites), Cluing and Epismo may have advantages.
Budget: 1Code is free and open-source; Cluing has a free tier; others may require payment.
Customization: For embedding agents in your own product, 21st Agents SDK is the way to go.

Ultimately, the best alternative depends on your specific use case, whether it's collaborative knowledge management, autonomous automation, coding assistance, or custom development.

Alternatives

1. Agently

Every other tool answers, retrieves, or runs brittle rules. Agently holds your whole company in context and does the work. 100+ connectors flow into one brain that never forgets. It links a Stripe event to a Slack thread to a Linear ticket on its own. When something needs doing, Jarvis routes it to an agent that runs it end to end: triggered, running, shipped. The work lands without you, nothing falls through the cracks. Connecting takes minutes. The layer between today's AI and tomorrow's AGI.

Pros

+ Agently offers a broader set of 100+ connectors, covering more tools out-of-the-box than Cluing's custom connectors.
+ Agently emphasizes autonomous, end-to-end execution of tasks (triggered, running, shipped) with an orchestrator (Jarvis), which may appeal to teams wanting more hands-off automation.
+ Agently positions itself as a 'company brain' that acts across the entire stack, potentially providing a more comprehensive solution for cross-tool workflows.

Cons

- Cluing focuses on capturing and organizing personal and team knowledge with a strong emphasis on context building and collaboration, which Agently may not match in depth.
- Cluing offers a free tier and is more accessible for individual users or small teams starting out, while Agently seems geared toward larger startup teams with a more complex setup.
- Cluing's hosted agents are designed to be handed off between teammates with context preservation, a feature that may be more explicit in Cluing than in Agently's orchestration model.

Choose Agently if you need a highly autonomous, cross-tool automation platform that can run your entire company's operations with minimal human intervention. Choose Cluing if you prioritize building a shared knowledge base and collaborative context for your team's AI agents, with a simpler, more user-friendly approach.

2. 1Code

Whats 1Code? An app to run your Claude Code agents in parallel that works on Mac and Web. On Mac - run locally, with or without worktrees. On Web - run in remote sandboxes with live previews of your app, mobile included, so you can check on agents from anywhere. Running multiple Claude Codes in parallel dramatically sped up how we build features.

Pros

+ 1Code is open-source and free, whereas Cluing Hosted Agents is a paid service.
+ 1Code offers a visual, Cursor-like UI with diff previews and a built-in git client, which may be more developer-friendly for coding tasks.
+ 1Code supports multiple AI models (Claude Code, Codex) and BYOK, giving users flexibility in model choice.
+ 1Code provides local execution options (with worktrees) for users who prefer keeping code on their own machine.
+ 1Code includes a kanban board and automations for managing agent workflows, which can be useful for team coordination.

Cons

- Cluing Hosted Agents focuses on collaborative knowledge management and context sharing across the team, while 1Code is primarily a coding agent client with less emphasis on shared knowledge bases.
- Cluing offers a unified workspace for capturing insights, building context, and sharing living documents, which 1Code does not provide.
- Cluing has custom connectors for any external tool with API or MCP, while 1Code's integration options are more limited to coding-related tools.
- Cluing is designed for non-developers and teams to collaborate with AI agents, whereas 1Code is more technical and developer-centric.
- 1Code's cloud sandboxes are for running coding agents, not for hosting general-purpose agents that manage tasks and knowledge like Cluing.

Choose 1Code if you are a developer or development team focused on running coding agents (like Claude Code) in parallel with a visual interface and local execution options. It's a strong alternative when your primary need is efficient code generation and review, rather than a shared knowledge workspace for broader team collaboration.

3. Epismo

Epismo is a next-gen project management platform that integrates AI agents into every step: structured task generation, task assignment, real-time collaboration, insight generation, and workflow automation. Start with the big picture and let AI handle the execution.

Pros

+ Epismo provides a structured project management layer with AI agents assigned to tasks, which may appeal to teams looking for a more formal workflow and tracking compared to Cluing's more flexible, context-driven workspace.
+ Epismo emphasizes reusable workflows and community-built templates, making it easy to start with proven processes, whereas Cluing focuses on evolving skills from personal insights.
+ Epismo integrates multiple AI models (Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, NotebookLM) directly into task execution, offering a multi-agent orchestration approach that might be more explicit than Cluing's hosted agents.

Cons

- Cluing offers a broader collaborative workspace that includes capturing insights from any source, sharing living context, and connecting to external tools via API/MCP, which Epismo may not match in terms of context persistence and knowledge management.
- Cluing's hosted agents run on their infrastructure and can publish websites/dashboards, whereas Epismo appears more focused on task management and workflow automation, lacking the same deployment capabilities.
- Cluing emphasizes a shared 'brain' for the whole team and agents, with evolving skills that update as you collect insights, which is a unique feature that Epismo's template-based approach may not replicate.

Choose Epismo if you need a structured project management tool with AI agents assigned to tasks and reusable workflows, especially for teams that prefer predefined processes. Choose Cluing if you want a more flexible, context-rich workspace where agents evolve with your knowledge and can deploy outputs.

4. AgentSky

Managed agent as a service: launch a long-horizon AI agent in one click — Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, or OpenClaw — with full history, managed recovery, and access through WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Slack, web, API developers, and CLI.

Pros

+ AgentSky offers a broader range of agent harnesses (Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw) and model choices, giving users more flexibility in selecting the best tool for their tasks.
+ AgentSky provides access through multiple channels including WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Slack, and a developer API, which may be more convenient for users who prefer messaging interfaces or need programmatic control.
+ AgentSky includes a managed sandbox with persistent workspace and recovery, which can be more robust for long-running, complex agent tasks compared to Cluing's hosted agents.

Cons

- Cluing focuses on collaborative context and knowledge sharing, allowing teams to build a shared 'brain' with living context, skills, and connectors. AgentSky is more about individual agent execution and may lack the same depth of team collaboration features.
- Cluing integrates deeply with its capture and snippet system, enabling users to save insights from any source and have agents evolve skills based on that knowledge. AgentSky does not emphasize this knowledge management aspect.
- Cluing offers a free tier with unlimited snippets and topics, which may be more accessible for individuals or small teams starting out, whereas AgentSky's pricing is not detailed but may require payment for full features.

Choose AgentSky if you need a flexible, multi-channel agent hosting platform with a wide variety of agent models and API access, especially for individual developers or teams focused on automation rather than collaborative knowledge building. It's ideal for those who want to run agents via messaging apps or integrate them into custom applications.

5. 21st Agents SDK

21st Agents SDK is the fastest way to add an AI agent to your app. Define your agent in TypeScript, deploy in one command, and embed a production-ready chat UI with Built-in streaming, session management, usage billing, and observability — so you can focus on what makes your agent unique, not infrastructure. Backed by Y Combinator (W26).

Pros

+ Provides a developer-first SDK for embedding AI agents directly into your own applications, offering more control and customization than Cluing's hosted workspace.
+ Includes built-in infrastructure like streaming, session management, usage billing, and observability, which may appeal to teams building production-grade agent features.
+ Backed by Y Combinator, suggesting strong startup support and potential for rapid iteration.

Cons

- Lacks Cluing's collaborative workspace features, such as shared context, team handoff, and mobile access, which are central to Cluing's value proposition.
- Requires development effort to integrate and deploy, whereas Cluing offers a ready-to-use hosted environment for non-developers.
- Does not include Cluing's knowledge capture and context-building tools (snippets, topics, clusters) that help agents evolve with insights.

Choose 21st Agents SDK if you are a developer building a custom AI agent feature into your own product and need full control over the agent's behavior and infrastructure. It's a better fit for engineering teams than for users seeking a collaborative, out-of-the-box agent workspace like Cluing.

About Hosted Agents in Cluing

View Hosted Agents in Cluing

Explore More

All Alternatives Product Comparisons