Netlify AI Gateway

Best Netlify AI Gateway Alternatives in 2025

4 alternatives found

Overview of Netlify AI Gateway

Netlify AI Gateway is a service that simplifies adding AI features to your web projects, especially those built on Netlify. It acts as a proxy between your application and AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini. Instead of managing individual provider accounts, API keys, and billing, you use a single gateway that securely handles credentials and usage. This lets developers focus on building features rather than dealing with infrastructure. It integrates seamlessly with Netlify Functions and Edge Functions, automatically injecting environment variables and using Netlify's credit-based billing. It's designed for developers who are "vibe coding"—experimenting quickly with AI—and want a fast path to production.

Why Look for Alternatives

While Netlify AI Gateway is convenient for Netlify users, it may not suit everyone. Some developers need a turnkey solution with a built-in chat UI, while others prefer to manage their own API keys or run agents locally. The alternatives below offer different approaches, from full agent platforms to local-first tools, each with unique strengths and trade-offs. Consider your specific needs: do you want a complete agent out of the box, or just a gateway? Do you need multi-provider support, or are you comfortable with a single provider? Are you looking for local execution or cloud-based? These questions will guide your choice.

Top Alternatives

1. 21st Agents SDK

21st Agents SDK is a strong alternative if you want a production-ready chat interface without building a frontend. It includes session management and usage billing out of the box, and you can deploy an entire agent with a single command. This is ideal for rapid prototyping or shipping a simple AI assistant quickly. However, it may be more opinionated about the provider or framework, and it's a newer product (backed by YC W26) compared to Netlify's established platform. If you're not already invested in Netlify's ecosystem, this could be a faster path to a live AI feature.

2. 1Code

1Code offers a Cursor-like visual coding agent with diff previews, a built-in git client, and real-time tool execution. It supports multiple AI providers (Claude Code, Codex) with BYOK (bring your own key), giving you flexibility. It runs locally with worktree isolation and background agents, enabling parallel development without cloud dependency. However, it's a coding agent client, not a gateway—you still manage your own API keys and billing. Also, note that 1Code is archived and read-only as of July 2026, which is a significant risk for production use. Choose this if you prefer a local, visual agent and don't mind handling credentials yourself.

3. Skillkit

Skillkit is an open-source, local-first tool that focuses on managing AI agent skills. It supports 46 agent formats and aggregates skills from multiple sources, with features like memory, security scanning, and team workflows. It runs locally with zero telemetry, giving you full control. However, it doesn't manage API keys or billing; you still need your own provider accounts. It's more about organizing skills than simplifying AI calls. If you're a developer who wants to manage skills across multiple coding tools and prefer a local, open-source solution, Skillkit is a great complement, though not a direct replacement for Netlify AI Gateway.

4. AgentSky

AgentSky provides a managed, persistent cloud environment for running AI agents, with a unified API across multiple agent harnesses and models. It includes built-in connectors for Slack, WhatsApp, and other channels, making it useful for production workflows. This is a different abstraction level than Netlify's serverless functions—it's designed for long-running agent sessions, not just simple inference calls. However, it requires adopting a new runtime and session model, and you'll need your own API key and billing. Choose AgentSky if you need to run persistent, multi-channel AI agents in the cloud and want flexibility in switching between models.

How to Choose

When selecting an alternative to Netlify AI Gateway, consider the following:

  • Deployment and Integration: If you're already on Netlify, the gateway's seamless integration is a big plus. Alternatives may require more setup or a different hosting environment.
  • Level of Abstraction: Do you want a full agent with UI (21st Agents SDK), a coding client (1Code), a skill manager (Skillkit), or a cloud agent runtime (AgentSky)? Each offers a different level of abstraction.
  • Provider Flexibility: Netlify AI Gateway supports multiple providers. If you need that, look for alternatives that also support multiple providers (1Code, AgentSky). If you're fine with one provider, 21st Agents SDK might work.
  • Control and Privacy: If you prefer local execution and no telemetry, Skillkit or 1Code are better. If you want managed cloud services, AgentSky or 21st Agents SDK are options.
  • Long-term Viability: Check the project's status. 1Code is archived, which is risky. Netlify is a large platform, but alternatives like 21st Agents SDK are newer. Choose a solution that's actively maintained.

Ultimately, the best alternative depends on your specific use case. If you need a quick, turnkey agent, go with 21st Agents SDK. If you want local control and skill management, Skillkit is excellent. For persistent cloud agents, AgentSky is powerful. And if you prefer a visual coding agent, 1Code might appeal, but be cautious about its archived status. Evaluate your priorities and test a few options to find the best fit.

Alternatives

21st Agents SDK

21st Agents SDK is the fastest way to add an AI agent to your app. Define your agent in TypeScript, deploy in one command, and embed a production-ready chat UI with Built-in streaming, session management, usage billing, and observability — so you can focus on what makes your agent unique, not infrastructure. Backed by Y Combinator (W26).

Pros

  • + Provides a complete, production-ready chat UI out of the box, whereas Netlify AI Gateway focuses on backend API proxying and requires you to build your own frontend.
  • + Includes built-in session management and usage billing, which are not core features of Netlify AI Gateway.
  • + Offers a one-command deployment for the entire agent, simplifying the process of getting an AI feature live.

Cons

  • - Netlify AI Gateway supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini) with automatic environment variable injection, while 21st Agents SDK may be more opinionated or limited to a specific provider or agent framework.
  • - Netlify AI Gateway integrates deeply with Netlify's ecosystem (Functions, Edge Functions, credit-based billing), which may be more seamless for existing Netlify users.
  • - 21st Agents SDK appears to be a newer, less established product (backed by YC W26) compared to Netlify's broader platform and enterprise support.

Choose 21st Agents SDK if you want a turnkey AI agent with a built-in chat interface and minimal setup, especially if you're building a standalone app and don't need Netlify's hosting or multi-provider flexibility. It's a good fit for rapid prototyping or shipping a simple AI assistant without managing backend infrastructure.

1Code

Whats 1Code? An app to run your Claude Code agents in parallel that works on Mac and Web. On Mac - run locally, with or without worktrees. On Web - run in remote sandboxes with live previews of your app, mobile included, so you can check on agents from anywhere. Running multiple Claude Codes in parallel dramatically sped up how we build features.

Pros

  • + 1Code offers a rich, Cursor-like UI with diff previews, built-in git client, and real-time tool execution, which may appeal to developers who prefer a visual coding agent interface over Netlify's server-side gateway.
  • + 1Code supports multiple AI providers (Claude Code, Codex) with BYOK, giving users flexibility to use their own API keys and models, whereas Netlify AI Gateway abstracts provider credentials and billing.
  • + 1Code provides local-first execution with worktree isolation and background agents, enabling parallel agent runs and local development without cloud dependency, which is different from Netlify's cloud-based gateway.

Cons

  • - 1Code is a coding agent client, not a gateway or proxy service; it does not manage API keys or billing on behalf of the user, so users still need to handle provider accounts and keys themselves.
  • - 1Code does not provide the same level of abstraction for AI provider credentials and usage billing as Netlify AI Gateway, which simplifies setup for Netlify projects.
  • - 1Code is focused on running coding agents locally or in cloud sandboxes, whereas Netlify AI Gateway is designed to integrate AI calls directly into Netlify Functions and Edge Functions with automatic environment variables.
  • - 1Code is archived and read-only as of July 2026, which may indicate lack of ongoing support or development, making it a risky choice for production use.

A user might choose 1Code over Netlify AI Gateway if they want a visual, multi-agent coding client with local execution and BYOK, rather than a server-side gateway for AI calls in Netlify projects. It's more suitable for developers who prefer to manage their own API keys and run agents in parallel locally.

Skillkit

The universal skill platform for AI coding agents. Auto-generate instructions with Primer, persist learnings with Memory, and distribute across Mesh networks. One CLI for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and 28 more.

Pros

  • + Skillkit is open source and runs locally, offering zero telemetry and full control over your environment.
  • + It supports a wide range of AI coding agents (46 formats) and aggregates skills from multiple sources, making it a versatile tool for developers who use various agents.
  • + Skillkit includes memory, security scanning, and team workflows, which can enhance the development experience beyond just API access.

Cons

  • - Skillkit does not provide managed API keys or billing for AI providers; you still need to handle your own provider accounts and credentials.
  • - It is focused on skill management and agent configuration, not on simplifying the direct invocation of AI models in your code like Netlify AI Gateway does.
  • - Skillkit requires more setup and technical expertise to integrate into your workflow compared to the seamless environment variables provided by Netlify AI Gateway.

Choose Skillkit if you are a developer who wants to manage and distribute AI agent skills across multiple coding tools, and you prefer a local, open-source solution with no telemetry. It is not a direct replacement for Netlify AI Gateway's managed API access, but it complements the AI development workflow by organizing skills and instructions.

AgentSky

<p>Managed agent as a service: launch a long-horizon AI agent in one click — Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, or OpenClaw — with full history, managed recovery, and access through WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Slack, web, API developers, and CLI.</p>

Pros

  • + AgentSky provides a managed, persistent cloud environment for running AI agents, which is a different abstraction level than Netlify's serverless functions but can be used to build AI-powered features without managing infrastructure.
  • + It offers a unified API across multiple agent harnesses and models, which could be appealing for developers who want flexibility in choosing AI tools without being locked into a single provider.
  • + AgentSky includes built-in connectors and multi-channel access (Slack, WhatsApp, etc.), which may be useful for deploying AI agents in production workflows.

Cons

  • - Netlify AI Gateway is tightly integrated with Netlify's deployment platform, providing automatic environment variables and billing through Netlify credits, whereas AgentSky is a separate service requiring its own API key and billing.
  • - AgentSky focuses on long-running agent sessions and harnesses, not on simplifying API key management for standard AI inference calls within a web app's serverless functions.
  • - Netlify AI Gateway is designed for developers already using Netlify's build and deploy pipeline, while AgentSky requires adopting a new runtime and session model, which may not fit existing Netlify projects.

A developer might choose AgentSky over Netlify AI Gateway if they need to run persistent, long-horizon AI agents (like Claude Code or Codex) in the cloud with multi-channel access, rather than making simple inference calls from serverless functions. It's also a fit for teams that want to switch between agent harnesses and models without reconfiguring their infrastructure.