Overview
Acti and Osloq are two AI-powered tools that aim to automate tasks, but they operate in completely different domains. Acti is an "agentic keyboard" that lets you type an intent and trigger actions—like fetching sports schedules, sharing location, or running custom workflows—without leaving the app you're in. Osloq, on the other hand, is an AI testing agent that runs your website in a real browser, follows plain-language test instructions, and returns a pass/fail verdict with full evidence.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Acti | Osloq |
|---|---|---|
| Core Function | Agentic keyboard that triggers actions from text input | AI agent that runs website tests in a real browser |
| Target User | Power users, productivity enthusiasts, developers | Developers, QA engineers, teams shipping web apps |
| Primary Interface | Keyboard bar overlay on any app | Web dashboard with plain-language test descriptions |
| Automation Scope | Custom workflows via Skill Keys (APIs, apps, data) | End-to-end browser testing (flows, sign-ups, checkouts) |
| Customization | Skill Builder to create and share custom skills | Plain-language test descriptions; no code needed |
| Community & Sharing | Actier community with skill downloads and creators | Not emphasized; team-focused shared history |
| Execution Environment | On-device keyboard overlay | Cloud sandbox with real browser |
| Evidence & Reporting | Direct action/result (e.g., link, schedule) | Screenshots, console errors, network logs, pass/fail verdict |
Pricing
Acti: Pricing is not publicly disclosed. The product appears to be in early access (selected for Google AI Startups). It likely uses a freemium or subscription model based on skill usage or premium skills.
Osloq: Transparent and scalable pricing:
- Free: $0/month, 50 credits, community support
- Pro: $29/month, 1000 credits, priority support
- Team: $99/month, 3 seats, 1200 credits/seat, shared history, role-based access
Pros and Cons
Acti
Pros:
- Eliminates app switching by working inside any text field
- Highly customizable with Skill Builder and API mashups
- Active community with thousands of shared skills
- Selected for Google AI Startups, indicating strong backing
Cons:
- Pricing not transparent; may be costly for heavy users
- Requires learning curve to build custom skills
- Limited to text-based input; no visual testing
Osloq
Pros:
- Runs tests in a real browser, providing accurate results
- No test code to write or maintain; plain language input
- Clear evidence (screenshots, logs) for debugging
- Transparent, scalable pricing with a free tier
Cons:
- Only useful for web testing; not a general productivity tool
- Credits-based system may limit heavy testing
- No community marketplace for shared tests
Verdict
Choose Acti if you want to supercharge your daily workflow by triggering actions from anywhere on your device, especially if you enjoy building and sharing custom automations. Choose Osloq if you need reliable, evidence-backed browser testing for your web projects without writing a single line of test code. Both are powerful AI agents, but they serve fundamentally different purposes.