Overview
Decawork and Iron Gorilla are both AI agent management platforms, but they approach the problem from different angles. Decawork is designed for IT teams to take control of employee-built AI agents, turning them into managed company assets. It supports agents built in any tool, from Claude Code to n8n, and provides a central control plane for access, oversight, and retirement. Iron Gorilla, on the other hand, is built for mission-critical industries like banking, healthcare, and defense. It treats AI agents like new hires, using a Behavioral Trust Score to gradually grant autonomy as agents prove their reliability. The platform runs agents inside its own infrastructure, ensuring security and compliance.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Decawork | Iron Gorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Core Approach | IT governance over employee-built agents | Trust-based autonomy for platform-provided agents |
| Target Audience | IT teams in companies with employee-built agents | Regulated industries requiring certainty |
| Agent Management | Central control plane with inventory, credentials, approvals | Single platform with built-in infrastructure |
| Trust Mechanism | IT-defined policies and access controls | Behavioral Trust Score that adjusts with performance |
| Deployment | Cloud-based (SOC 2) | Cloud and on-premise options |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | SOX, HIPAA, ITAR, FedRAMP, etc. |
| Agent Origin | Employee-built in various tools | Platform-provided, starting supervised |
| Autonomy | Granted via IT approval gates | Earned through trust score |
| Monitoring | Real-time registry with status | Real-time behavior monitoring with automatic pull-back |
| Use Cases | Marketing, recruiting, IT, finance | Fraud detection, claims processing, defense intel |
Pricing
Both Decawork and Iron Gorilla do not publicly disclose their pricing. They likely offer custom enterprise pricing based on the number of agents, features, and deployment requirements. Decawork may be more accessible for smaller companies, while Iron Gorilla's pricing might reflect its enterprise-grade infrastructure and compliance capabilities. Contact their sales teams for detailed quotes.
Pros and Cons
Decawork
Pros:
- Embraces employee-driven innovation by managing agents built in any tool
- Centralized control and visibility for IT teams
- SOC 2 compliance for security assurance
Cons:
- Less focus on regulated industry compliance
- Trust model is more manual, relying on IT policies rather than automated behavioral scoring
Iron Gorilla
Pros:
- Strong focus on mission-critical industries with strict compliance requirements
- Automated trust scoring reduces need for manual oversight
- Offers on-premise deployment for data sovereignty
Cons:
- May be overkill for companies without heavy regulatory needs
- Agents are platform-provided, potentially limiting flexibility for custom-built agents
Verdict
Choose Decawork if your company already has employees building agents and you need IT governance to manage them safely. Choose Iron Gorilla if you operate in a regulated industry and need agents that earn trust autonomously with strict compliance.