Firma.dev vs Logo.dev: Detailed Comparison

Overview

Firma.dev and Logo.dev are both developer-focused API services, but they solve entirely different problems. Firma.dev is an ultra-low-cost e-signature API designed for SaaS companies that want to embed document signing directly into their applications. Logo.dev is a simple, reliable API for retrieving company logos – perfect for dashboards, fintech apps, and any UI that displays company information.

Feature Comparison

FeatureFirma.devLogo.dev
Primary FunctionE-signature API for embedding document signingCompany logo API for retrieving brand logos
Target AudienceDevelopers, SaaS teams, startupsDevelopers building dashboards, fintech apps, internal tools
Integration ComplexitySimple REST API, embeddable editors, integration in hoursVery simple API call; can be used as inline HTML img tag
White-Label / BrandingFully white-labeled; resell-readyNot applicable – logos returned as-is
Pricing ModelPay-as-you-go at €0.029/envelope; free sandboxFree tier available; paid plans for higher usage
Compliance & SecuritySOC 2, ISO 27001, eIDAS, GDPR; audit trailsNot applicable
Data CoverageN/A50M+ companies, 52M brand assets, 628M domains
Developer ExperienceSwagger docs, pre-built UI components, webhooks, sample appsSimple API, dark mode, retina sizes, grayscale options

Pricing

Firma.dev: Pay-as-you-go at €0.029 per envelope (about 3Β’). No monthly fees, no contracts, no minimums. Free sandbox with unlimited usage for testing. This is dramatically cheaper than traditional e-signature providers like DocuSign, where a single envelope can cost $4-5.

Logo.dev: Free tier available that is sufficient for many use cases. Paid plans for higher request volumes (specific pricing not provided on the page). The free tier makes it easy to try and integrate without any upfront cost.

Pros and Cons

Firma.dev

Pros:

  • Ultra-low cost – 99% cheaper than DocuSign
  • Developer-first with simple REST API and quick integration
  • Fully white-label and resell-ready
  • Compliant with major regulations (SOC 2, ISO 27001, eIDAS, GDPR)
  • Free sandbox for testing with real documents

Cons:

  • Limited to e-signature use case only
  • Relatively new provider with smaller community compared to legacy players

Logo.dev

Pros:

  • Extremely easy to integrate – just an API call or img tag
  • Huge coverage: 50M+ companies, 628M domains
  • Smart fallback logos (initials) ensure UI always looks good
  • Dark mode, retina, and size options
  • Free tier is generous and sufficient for many projects

Cons:

  • Only provides logos – no other brand asset types (e.g., icons, colors)
  • Dependent on public brand data; some logos may be outdated or missing

Verdict

Choose Firma.dev if you need to embed e-signatures into your SaaS product at a fraction of the cost of traditional providers. Choose Logo.dev if you need reliable, fast company logos for your UI – it's a no-brainer for any app that displays company information. Both are developer-friendly, but serve completely different purposes.