Overview
Decawork and SupaCove are two distinct products addressing different challenges in modern IT infrastructure. Decawork focuses on governing employee-built AI agents, treating them as company assets with access control, oversight, and lifecycle management. SupaCove is a self-hosted PostgreSQL backup tool that encrypts and stores backups in your own object storage, ensuring data sovereignty and standalone recovery.
While both products emphasize control and security, they operate in separate domains: Decawork for AI agent governance and SupaCove for database backup and disaster recovery. This comparison will help you understand their features, pricing, and ideal use cases.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Decawork | SupaCove |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Purpose | Governance and control platform for employee-built AI agents. | Self-hosted PostgreSQL backup tool with encryption and BYOS storage. |
| Target Users | IT teams managing AI agents across departments. | Developers and DevOps teams needing encrypted database backups. |
| Core Functionality | Agent registry, policy enforcement, real-time action approval, lifecycle management. | Six-stage backup pipeline: export, encryption, staging, upload, verification, notification. |
| Security & Compliance | SOC 2 compliant; company-specific models approve actions based on policies. | age encryption (X25519 + ChaCha20-Poly1305), offline identity, secrets redaction. |
| Integration | Connects to agents built on Claude Code, Codex, or any vibecoding tool. | Supports Supabase, Neon, Railway, and standard PostgreSQL. |
| Deployment Model | Cloud-based SaaS (demo required). | Self-hosted via Docker or source build; AGPL-3.0 license. |
| Key Differentiator | Real-time policy enforcement and contextual access for AI agents. | Backups encrypted before leaving instance, stored in your own object storage, standalone restore. |
| Backup/Recovery | Not applicable. | Recovery requires only ciphertext, offline age identity, and recovery script. |
| Pricing Model | Not publicly disclosed; likely subscription-based. | Free and open-source; free plans for some platforms, paid for advanced features. |
| Support & Documentation | Demo available; contact founders. | Comprehensive docs, quickstart, FAQ, guides. |
Pricing
Decawork: Pricing is not publicly available. The website encourages booking a demo or contacting founders for a walkthrough, suggesting a custom or subscription-based model. Potential costs may scale with the number of agents or users.
SupaCove: SupaCove is free and open-source under AGPL-3.0. It offers free plans for Supabase, Neon, and Railway databases, including automatic backups. Paid plans add features like third-party copies in your own object storage. Self-hosting means you only pay for your infrastructure (e.g., S3 storage, compute).
Pros and Cons
Decawork
Pros:
- Centralized control and visibility for all employee-built AI agents.
- Real-time policy enforcement with company-specific models.
- SOC 2 compliant, ensuring security and auditability.
Cons:
- Pricing not transparent; requires demo and likely custom quote.
- Limited to AI agent governance, not a general-purpose tool.
SupaCove
Pros:
- Self-hosted and open-source, giving full control and transparency.
- Strong encryption with offline key management and standalone restore.
- Supports multiple managed PostgreSQL platforms, including free plans.
Cons:
- Requires technical expertise to set up and maintain (Docker, S3 storage).
- Does not back up file contents (e.g., Supabase Storage files) or Edge Function code.
Verdict
Decawork and SupaCove serve entirely different needs: Decawork is for IT teams needing to govern and secure AI agents built by employees, while SupaCove is for developers requiring reliable, encrypted PostgreSQL backups. Choose Decawork if you need centralized AI agent management with policy enforcement; choose SupaCove if you need self-hosted, encrypted database backups with standalone recovery.